Critical Mass for Freedom and Movement

© Crit­i­cal Mass Berlin

Every last Fri­day of the month, cyclists meet in both large and small cities to take to the streets in con­voy and as sheer mass. The prin­ci­ple of this gath­er­ing uses a rule of the road traf­fic reg­u­la­tions accord­ing to which a group of at least twelve cyclists is con­sid­ered a vehi­cle and can, there­fore, pass through a traf­fic light that turns red. Those who cycle in front decide where to go. The cyclists want to draw atten­tion to the fact that even today, the car-friend­ly city from the last cen­tu­ry is still a real­i­ty in many places. Thus, Crit­i­cal Mass is a peace­ful and sol­idary protest against the hege­mo­ny of motor­ized traf­fic in urban plan­ning worldwide.


Project

Crit­i­cal Mass


Actors

cyclists


Year

Since 1997


Loca­tion

Berlin, Ger­many

© Crit­i­cal Mass Berlin
© Crit­i­cal Mass Berlin
© Crit­i­cal Mass Berlin
© Crit­i­cal Mass Berlin

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */

From Locomotive Workshop to Library

© Sti­jn Bollaert

In 2009, the munic­i­pal­i­ty of Tilburg, togeth­er with two large real estate and con­struc­tion groups, acquired a mas­sive plot direct­ly behind the main rail­way sta­tion. The orig­i­nal plan was to demol­ish exist­ing build­ings, such as the for­mer loco­mo­tive hall, or LocHal for short, and to con­struct huge office and apart­ment com­plex­es. How­ev­er, the deci­sion was reversed. Instead of demo­li­tion, rede­vel­op­ment and con­ver­sions took root. And so, in 2019, the munic­i­pal library—which is much more than just a col­lec­tion of books—opened here. Its glass hall pro­tects an inner-city square with a café and open stair­case. There are also archives, offices, as well as event rooms and, on the perime­ters, work­shop areas and small meet­ing rooms. The many peo­ple who use the build­ing for a wide range of activ­i­ties make it clear that pub­lic space will con­tin­ue to play an essen­tial role in the future.


Project

LocHal


Actors

CIVIC Archi­tects, Braaks­ma & Roos archi­tecten­bu­reau, Inside Out­side / Petra Blaisse, Mecanoo, archi­tects; Gemeente Tilburg, De Bib­lio­theek Mid­den-Bra­bant, Kun­st­loc Bra­bant, commission


Year

Since 2019


Loca­tion

Tilburg Nether­lands

The for­mer work­shop where loco­mo­tives were assem­bled and main­tained. Archive image © Civic Architects
© Sti­jn Bollaert
© Sti­jn Bollaert
Aer­i­al pic­ture of the rail­road area in the Dutch city of Tilburg. © Karel Tomei

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */

Work Yard for Construction Materials

The work yard set up by Bel­la­s­tock is simul­ta­ne­ous­ly a ware­house, recy­cling work­shop, gar­den and stage for pro­to­types made from build­ing rub­ble. © Bellastock

Why is the cur­rent mantra in the con­struc­tion indus­try build, build, build—when reuse, recy­cling, or oth­er forms of respon­si­ble use of resources should be the focus of atten­tion? The inter­dis­ci­pli­nary col­lec­tive Bel­la­s­tock address­es this and oth­er major prob­lems in the con­struc­tion indus­try. La Fab­rique du Clos in Stains, a small town in the north-east of Paris, was used to store mate­ri­als from the demo­li­tion of res­i­den­tial tow­ers. Yet the yard also became a meet­ing place and stage for the neighborhood’s res­i­dents. There were dis­cus­sions: about future urban spaces, how and by whom and with what they will be designed. These activ­i­ties result­ed in pro­to­types for sheds, plant­i­ng beds, arbors, street pave­ment, play­ground equip­ment, bench­es, pavil­ions, and much more. They show how small-scale alter­na­tives can chal­lenge estab­lished systems.


Project

La Fab­rique du Clos


Actors

Bel­la­s­tock, archi­tects, Cen­tre Sci­en­ti­Wique et Tech­nique du Bâtiment (CSTB), L’Amicale des Locataire, Closerie du Lézard, Léonard Nguyen, Mael Canal, Fred Kei, Cheb Chantier, Clé­ment Guil­laume, Régie de Quarti­er de Stains, Cen­tre de Loisirs Romain Rol­land, Sauve­g­arde 93


Year

2015—2018


Loca­tion

Clos Saint-Lazare, Stains, France

Con­crete walls are cut to the required sizes. © Alex­is Leclercq
A gar­den bed with walls of con­crete blocks in tra­di­tion­al dry con­struc­tion. © Clé­ment Guillaume
The decon­struc­tion of build­ings usu­al­ly hap­pens by the down­right smash­ing of the built struc­ture. Here in Stains, parts have been ›saved‹ to demon­strate that many mate­ri­als that would oth­er­wise sim­ply end up on rub­ble heaps could have a sec­ond life. © Bellastock

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */

Provoking Encounters

The Robert Walser sculp­ture wants to rethink Robert Walser and pro­voke encoun­ters. Accord­ing to Hirschhorn, it wants to be an event and shape a new form of art in pub­lic space. Yet the Hirschhorn land­scape of palettes, ply­wood boards and adhe­sive tape is not an object that is just stand­ing around some­where and always looks the same. It wants to be acces­si­ble to every­one at all times and is actu­al­ly only cre­at­ed through inter­ac­tion with the space, through the activ­i­ties that take place in it, and through the peo­ple who appro­pri­ate these spaces. Thomas Hirschhorn, Robert Walser-Sculp­ture, 2019, Place de la Gare, Biel/Bienne, Switzer­land. Cour­tesy the artist and ESS/SPA Swiss Sculp­ture Exhi­bi­tion. © Enrique Muñoz García

Thomas Hirschhorn’s works address the chal­lenges of our time. They deal with cli­mate emer­gency and jus­tice, con­sumer excess and alien­ation. Many of the geopo­lit­i­cal dis­cus­sions raised by the artist, which we can usu­al­ly hold at a dis­tance, col­lapse over and upon us. We break in. We become part of the Hirschhorn­ian cos­mos, which so clear­ly says how impor­tant it is to take a stance. At first glance, the exhib­it­ed col­lage seems strange­ly sober, almost alien­at­ed. Val­ues and atti­tudes, not solu­tions, are at its core. We seek sim­ple answers to the mul­ti­tude of ques­tions in vain. Rather, the project is about estab­lish­ing social rela­tion­ships, act­ing togeth­er, the inven­tion of prac­tices that pro­duce or change spaces.


Artist

Thomas Hirschhorn


Project

Schema Art and Pub­lic Space


Year

2020


Project

Robert-Walser-Sculp­ture


Com­mis­sion

Fon­da­tion Expo­si­tion Suisse de Sculp­ture-ESS/S­tiftung Schweiz­erische Plas­tikausstel­lung SPA


Year

2019


Loca­tion

Biel, Switzer­land


Project

Too too-much much


Com­mis­sion

Muse­um Dhondt-Dhaenens


Year

2010


Loca­tion

Deurle, Bel­gium

»I love Robert Walser« says Hirschhorn about the writer born in Biel, Switzer­land. Walser always “described the small, the unno­ticed, the weak, the unim­por­tant, the seri­ous, [took it] seri­ous­ly and was inter­est­ed in it. It was in this spir­it that the Robert Walser sculp­ture, a built land­scape that will fill the entire sta­tion fore­court of Biel/Bienne in 2019, was cre­at­ed as a reminder and homage to as well as a meet­ing place with this man and his work. It was planned and real­ized as a pub­lic place of expe­ri­ence, open to all—with 86 days—of read­ings, exhi­bi­tions, a lit­er­a­ture insti­tute, a Walser cen­ter with a work­ing library, a dai­ly news­pa­per and a bar, Esperan­to cours­es and the­ater, children’s pro­grams, talks, films, doc­u­men­taries, hikes and dai­ly open­ings. Thomas Hirschhorn, Robert Walser-Sculp­ture, 2019, Place de la Gare, Biel/Bienne, Switzer­land. Cour­tesy the artist and ESS/SPA Swiss Sculp­ture Exhi­bi­tion. © Enrique Muñoz García
»You need to have a plan,« says Swiss artist Thomas Hirschhorn, and there­fore maps his work and think­ing in detailed text-image col­lages. Thomas Hirschhorn, Schema: Art and Pub­lic Space, 2016, 80×150 cm, Card­board, prints, tape. Cour­tesy of the Artist and Gal­le­ria Alfon­so Arti­a­co, Napoli
Thomas Hirschhorn, Robert Walser-Sculp­ture, 2019, Place de la Gare, Biel/Bienne, Switzer­land. Cour­tesy the artist and ESS/SPA Swiss Sculp­ture Exhi­bi­tion. © Enrique Muñoz García

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */

Architecture’s Second Life

Care­ful removal of a wall cladding made of Car­rara mar­ble pan­els at the Nord­bahn­hof sta­tion in Brus­sels. © Rotor

The work of Rotor and Rotor Decon­struc­tion (RotorDC) is not con­cerned with the con­struc­tion of build­ings or cities as we know them. Instead, the office devel­ops strate­gies for the care­ful decon­struc­tion of hous­es slat­ed for demo­li­tion. Mate­ri­als recov­ered through these process­es of dis­man­tling are re-claimed and offered for sale on a web­site. The spec­trum is broad and ranges from cab­i­net han­dles to oak par­quet, from lamps to porce­lain wash­basins, from glass blocks to floor tiles. Rotor’s gen­er­al aim is to raise aware­ness of exist­ing assets and cre­ate a legal frame­work for reuse. Many local author­i­ties now use the collective’s hand­book when con­sid­er­ing new lives for exist­ing pub­lic buildings.


Project

Rotor / RotorDC (Rotor Deconstruction)


Actors

Rotor, archi­tects, lawyers, researchers, con­sul­tants, educators


Year

Since 2016


Loca­tions

Var­i­ous

Assort­ed acoustic pan­els from the Générale de Banque build­ing in Brus­sels. © Rotor
Work­ers dis­as­sem­ble a ceil­ing cov­er­ing. © Rotor
Inside the Insti­tut de Génie Civ­il in Liège, Bel­gium. How can build­ings be designed, asks Lionel Devlieger of Rotor, so that their com­po­nents become avail­able and as use­ful as pos­si­ble for a sec­ond or even third life? © Olivi­er Béart

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */

Like a Fox in the City

Greenfort’s paint­ings tell sto­ries of the fox: how it creeps through the city, across waste­lands and through back­yards. He looks cau­tious, but also sovereign—because the prox­im­i­ty between fox (or oth­er wild ani­mals) and humans has long been no longer a pecu­liar­i­ty, even in dense­ly built-up and inhab­it­ed cities. But the pho­tog­ra­ph­er does not only make the fox and its con­tem­po­rary habi­tats vis­i­ble with his works. Green­fort also illu­mi­nates larg­er ques­tions of ecol­o­gy, of the con­nec­tions between eco­nom­ic, social and cul­tur­al phe­nom­e­na. And so the images of the fox in the city speak not only of coex­is­tence, but also of an adap­ta­tion of the fox’s habi­tat, made nec­es­sary by the destruc­tion of or dis­place­ment from oth­er habi­tats due to mas­sive human inter­ven­tion. Tue Green­fort, Daim­ler­straße 38, Pho­to on alu­mini­um, 40×59 cm, 2001, Edi­tion 5 + 1 AP © Tue Green­fort and KÖNIG Galerie Berlin, Lon­don, Tokyo

An increas­ing num­ber of wild ani­mals are liv­ing in our cities. The diver­si­ty of species in urban agglom­er­a­tions is even greater than in the areas sur­round­ing them. The pho­to­graph­ic series by artist Tue Green­fort pro­pels this coex­is­tence of human and fox into plain sight. He points out that the abun­dant and grow­ing diver­si­ty of ani­mal life in cities con­fronts us with new challenges—because not every­one is hap­py about this cohab­i­ta­tion. As a result, plan­ning faces sig­nif­i­cant chal­lenges. It must not only take increas­ing and more com­pre­hen­sive care of the diverse needs and desires of dif­fer­ent peo­ple but also those crea­tures with no voic­es of their own in urban devel­op­ment processes.


Project

Daim­ler­straße 38


Artist

Tue Green­fort


Year

2001


Loca­tion

Frank­furt, Germany

© Tue Green­fort and KÖNIG Galerie Berlin, Lon­don, Tokyo
© Tue Green­fort and KÖNIG Galerie Berlin, Lon­don, Tokyo
© Tue Green­fort and KÖNIG Galerie Berlin, Lon­don, Tokyo

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */

The Cooperative Housing Project Above a Tram Depot

© Mar­tin Stollenwerk

The large, up to sev­en-sto­ry res­i­den­tial and com­mer­cial build­ing in Zurich’s Wiedikon dis­trict is any­thing but ordi­nary. The build­ing is like a small town: com­plete with day­care cen­ter, doctor’s office, bank, art-house cin­e­ma, bars, restau­rant, flower shop, and tram depot. Fur­ther­more, Kalk­bre­ite is a cer­ti­fied »2000 Watt site in oper­a­tion«: Through active sus­tain­abil­i­ty mea­sures, those liv­ing and work­ing there reduce their eco­log­i­cal foot­print. Peo­ple cook and eat togeth­er, work­rooms are shared, an object library makes it pos­si­ble to bor­row equip­ment, and no one has their own car. The result­ing sav­ings are cur­rent­ly around 50% com­pared to aver­age house­hold usage in Zurich. The vision­ary approach of the Kalk­bre­ite will, in the long term, be applied to the entire city in order to con­tribute marked­ly to cli­mate justice.


Project

Res­i­den­tial and com­mer­cial build­ing Kalkbreite


Actors

Genossen­schaft Kalk­bre­ite, plan­ning and con­tract; Müller Sigrist Archi­tects AG, archi­tec­ture office; HAAG. LA, land­scape archi­tec­ture; City of Zurich, property


Year

Since 2006, work­shop stadt. labor / »Visions for the Kalk­bre­ite Site«; 2014, build­ing occupancy


Loca­tion

Zurich, Switzer­land

Genossen­schaft Kalk­bre­ite, Zurich, Müller Sigrist Architek­ten © Michael Egloff
In addi­tion to the pub­licly acces­si­ble inner court­yard of Kalk­bre­ite, which is locat­ed above the street­car hall of the depot, there are oth­er out­door spaces such as the acces­si­ble roof areas, which are only acces­si­ble to the res­i­dents of the block. © Genossen­schaft Kalk­bre­ite, Volk­er Schopp
© Genossen­schaft Kalk­bre­ite, Volk­er Schopp

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */

Transformation Instead of Demolition and Construction

© Philippe Ruault

All over the world, large hous­ing estates like Cité du Parc rise upwards out of spa­cious park land­scapes. They are often con­sid­ered »social hotspots.« As is the case here. In the ear­ly 2000s, the French state decid­ed to rethink the future of such hous­ing estates. This is where the archi­tec­ture firm Laca­ton & Vas­sal with Druot comes in. The team had been work­ing on this ques­tion for some time: How can spa­tial trans­for­ma­tions be planned and imple­ment­ed so that they do not lead to occu­pant dis­place­ment? The office’s work illus­trates that alter­na­tives to demo­li­tion and new con­struc­tion do exist. And they define new qual­i­ties in build­ings, which many believe can­not be improved.


Project

Trans­for­ma­tion de 530 Loge­ments et création de 8 loge­ments en toitures—Grand Parc Bordeaux


Con­trib­u­tors

Laca­ton & Vas­sal Archi­tects, Frédéric Druot Archi­tec­ture, Christophe Hutin Archi­tec­ture, archi­tec­ture ofWices; Bernard Blanc, for­mer Gen­er­al Direc­tor Aqui­ta­nis; Alain Jup­pé, for­mer O.P.H. de la com­mu­nauté Urbaine de May­or of Bor­deaux; Aqui­ta­nis O. P.H. de la com­mu­nauté Urbaine de Bor­deaux, commission


Year

2011—2016


Loca­tion

Bor­deaux, France

The hous­es of the Cité after the recon­struc­tion mea­sures. 2,300 of 4,000 apart­ments were ren­o­vat­ed between 2012 and 2017. But Aqui­ta­nis also car­ried out sim­i­lar mea­sures in oth­er large hous­ing estates in Bor­deaux, test­ing a dif­fer­ent approach to exist­ing build­ings instead of demo­li­tion and new con­struc­tion as part of the Généra­tions d’Habi­tat Inno­vant (GHI) pro­gram. © Philippe Ruault
© Philippe Ruault
Aqui­ta­nis, the social hous­ing asso­ci­a­tion of the Bor­deaux Métro­pole local author­i­ty, is the own­er of the build­ings. The company’s for­mer gen­er­al man­ag­er, Bernard Blanc, was able to pre­vent the demo­li­tion, among oth­er things by argu­ing that the Cité du Grand Parc has been part of the UNESCO World Her­itage Site of Bor­deaux since 2007. Fol­low­ing an archi­tec­tur­al com­pe­ti­tion, the deci­sion to retain the build­ings will mark the start of the ren­o­va­tion work in 2011. The con­struc­tion task com­pris­es the trans­for­ma­tion of a total of three disc-like res­i­den­tial build­ings: Blocks H and I, each 150 meters long and 45 meters high, and Block G, which is 60 meters long but only 31 meters high. © Philippe Ruault
© Philippe Ruault
In the first phase of the recon­struc­tion, the lat­er con­ser­va­to­ries and bal­conies, which were deliv­ered by usu­al trucks, were placed in front of the exist­ing facade. Only then did the adap­ta­tion of the exist­ing shell of the build­ings con­tin­ue: the old win­dows were dis­man­tled and new open­ings were cut into the facades. The quick assem­bly, made pos­si­ble by the high degree of use of pre­fab­ri­cat­ed ele­ments, helped to ensure that the occu­pants did not have to move out dur­ing the recon­struc­tion work. © Philippe Ruault

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */