A Co-Financed Bridge Generates New Impulses

© Annette Behrens

Twen­ty years ago, the archi­tec­ture office ZUS moved into an anony­mous Schieblock in Rot­ter­dam as an anti-squat­ter. At that time, how­ev­er, the areas sur­round­ing this block were cut up and sep­a­rat­ed by roads and rail­way lines. This is how the idea of a bridge was born. The hope: new impuls­es and uses for emp­ty build­ings and urban waste­lands. Inter­est­ing­ly, the bridge brought peo­ple togeth­er even before it exist­ed. Via an inter­net plat­form, peo­ple were able to pur­chase wood­en plank­ing for the future bridge, which was ful­ly opened in 2015. Oth­er aspects of the project were strong­ly sup­port­ed by the munic­i­pal­i­ty of Rot­ter­dam: Work and office space, restau­rants, cafés, and green spaces. Since then, there has been a lot of talk about the quarter’s new vital­i­ty but also about the con­se­quences of upgrad­ing and exclusivity.


Project

Luchtsin­gel


Actors

Zones Urbaines Sen­si­ble (ZUS), ini­tia­tive, plan­ning, archi­tec­ture; approx. 8,000 crowd­fund­ing par­tic­i­pants, co-financ­ing; Rot­ter­dam City Coun­cil, co-financ­ing and organization


Year

Since 2011


Loca­tion

Rot­ter­dam, Netherlands

The entire pedes­tri­an bridge is paint­ed in sig­nal yel­low, for Kris­t­ian Kore­man of ZUS the col­or of a tem­po­rary bridge. But this is no longer the bridge—here in the Schiekade cross­ing. Once emp­ty office build­ings like the Schieblock are now filled with uses: Archi­tec­tur­al firms, cre­ative indus­tries, social uses and a depart­ment store in which Rot­ter­dam prod­ucts are sold have set­tled here. © Ossip van Duivenbode
The first con­struc­tion phase of the Luchtsin­gel was financed by the sale of indi­vid­ual wood­en slats, which were offered for sale for 25 Euros each. 17,000 boards were sold in this way. © Ossip van Duivenbode
Luchtsin­gel (Luft­gracht) is the name of a 390-meter-long wood­en bridge that the ini­tia­tors describe as a cat­a­lyst for eco­nom­ic growth—not least because it con­nects dis­tricts in the north of Rot­ter­dam that were pre­vi­ous­ly sep­a­rat­ed by rail­road tracks with the city cen­ter. Archi­tect Elma van Box­el and archi­tect Kris­t­ian Kore­man from the Zones Urbaines Sen­si­bles (ZUS) office ini­ti­at­ed a crowd­fund­ing cam­paign in 2012 to raise funds for the bridge. © Ossip van Duivenbode
© Ossip van Duivenbode

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */

Community-Building Constructions

Casa do Vapor, Lis­bon (2013). Togeth­er with many local col­lab­o­ra­tors, the inter­dis­ci­pli­nary col­lec­tive Con­struct­Lab built and used this build­ing on the south side of the Tejo, which was simul­ta­ne­ous­ly an open-air class­room, pub­lic library, kitchen, bicy­cle repair shop, skate ramp and play­ground, and a piz­za oven. It was built with recy­cled wood from anoth­er project and was sim­ple enough for chil­dren to par­tic­i­pate as well as adults. Even though the tem­po­rary struc­ture had to be dis­man­tled at the end of the sum­mer, the social links and bonds that had been formed over the short peri­od are still evi­dent today. © Alexan­der Römer

The works of con­struct­Lab unfold in the cos­mos between imag­i­na­tion and life. But the focus of the collective’s work is not on cre­at­ing fixed and unal­ter­able facts. Instead, they active­ly seek ways to give form to the desires and hopes expressed in appro­pri­a­tions. The Baukiosk takes on the role of a sym­bol in this con­text. As a com­plex struc­ture, it embod­ies a par­tic­u­lar form of city-mak­ing that combines—or delib­er­ate­ly collides—differing inter­ests with dif­fer­ent oppor­tu­ni­ties. Thus, the kiosk is a meet­ing place as well as a col­lec­tion point. Ana­log bill­board and dig­i­tal dis­play. Infor­ma­tion sys­tem and rest­ing point. It is always many things and every­thing at once.


Project

Baukiosk


Actors

con­struct­Lab


Year

2020


Loca­tion

Berlin, Ger­many

© Alexan­der Römer
The Arch, Genk (2017). Designed as an exper­i­men­tal lab­o­ra­to­ry, this project was ded­i­cat­ed to rethink­ing the his­to­ry of the small Bel­gian town. For­mer­ly dom­i­nat­ed by min­ing and indus­tries, the ques­tion of the future of Genk was at the cen­ter of events and work­shops. © Julie Guiches

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */

Of People in Cities

Bêka & Lemoine, Homo Urbanus, HD, col­or, France, 2017—2020. Image and sound: Ila Bêka, edit­ing: Louise Lemoine & Ila Bêka, Pro­duc­tion: Bêka & Lemoine. Homo Urbanus Neapoli­tanus (45 min), Homo Urbanus Rabatius (45 min), Homo Urbanus Petrobur­gu­mus (45 min), Homo Urbanus Vene­tianus (55 min) © Bêka & Lemoine

The mov­ing images show Bogotá and St. Peters­burg, Rabat and Seoul, Naples and Tokyo, Doha and Shang­hai, Kyoto and Venice. We are immersed in scenes of the every­day. There is fish­ing, clean­ing, danc­ing, and laugh­ing. What we see here is city. But it is not that city that shuf­fles from one mega project to anoth­er to claim its own in inter­na­tion­al com­pe­ti­tion. Rather, the spaces in this film speak of use. They show us that cities are, above and beyond, lived spaces that come alive only through us and our activ­i­ties. We do not find the same­ness of glob­al cities here. Instead: plu­ral­i­ty, het­ero­gene­ity, and again and again, site-spe­cif­ic being, mak­ing, and doing.


Project

Homo Urbanus


Film­mak­ers

Ila Bêka & Louise Lemoine


Year

Since 2018


Loca­tions

Var­i­ous

© Bêka & Lemoine
© Bêka & Lemoine

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */

River Landscapes in the City

© Lucía de Mosteyrín

The film Swim City shows us how vital rivers are for the well-being of the entire urban pop­u­la­tion. Whether in the Danube baths in Vien­na, the botan­i­cal gar­dens of Tbil­isi, or the rivers in Basel and Zurich—everywhere peo­ple are jump­ing into the water on warm and even cold days. In oth­er cities, too, where rivers are only just being redis­cov­ered as open spaces, ini­tia­tives are being formed to raise aware­ness of the val­ue of water in the city. This, how­ev­er, goes far beyond the mere pop­u­lar­iz­ing of swim­ming. They are also move­ments that fight for pub­lic access to water against the back­ground of increas­ing pri­va­ti­za­tion of riv­er banks. They make it clear that rivers must be tak­en seri­ous­ly as impor­tant arter­ies in larg­er eco­log­i­cal structures.


Project

Swim City


Con­trib­u­tors

Jürg Egli, artist and Wilm­mak­er; Lucı́a de Mosteyrı́n, pho­tog­ra­ph­er; Bar­bara Buser, Andreas Ruby, and Yuma Shi­no­hara, co-cura­tion; Swiss Archi­tec­ture Muse­um Basel (S AM), commission


Year

2018, Film­ing


Loca­tions

Basel, Bern, Zurich, and Gene­va, Switzerland

Jürg Egli, Swim City, 3‑Kanal Instal­la­tion in video loop (18 min), 2019. © Jürg Egli
© Jürg Egli
© Lucía de Mosteyrín

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */

From Wasteland to Neighborhood Local

The so-called Farm­House is con­sid­ered the heart of Par­ck­farm. The sec­ond-hand green­house was moved from the Nether­lands to Brus­sels. Today, it serves as a place for meet­ings, cook­ing, and eat­ing. One of the ini­tia­tors was the design office 1010 Archi­tec­ture Urban­ism, which man­aged the par­tic­i­pa­to­ry build­ing process in coop­er­a­tion with the JES and Yota! orga­ni­za­tions. © Rossel & Cie — Bruno D’Alimonte

In the north of Brus­sels, sur­round­ed by streets and yet almost hard to find, a small par­adise has emerged. In 2013, a diverse team put an idea into prac­tice: they com­bined the spe­cial and unique fea­tures of a park with urban agri­cul­ture and micro-farm­ing. Involved were local ini­tia­tives and groups that had been using the fringes of the fal­low land for some time for the col­lec­tive cul­ti­va­tion of fruit and veg­eta­bles, small ani­mal hus­bandry, and pigeon­ries. The result­ing location—Parckfarm—still brings the neigh­bor­hood togeth­er today. Dif­fer­ent actors orga­nize var­i­ous activ­i­ties, work­shops, gar­den­ing, and debates. How­ev­er, a land use plan for the area is now in place. Neigh­bor­hood asso­ci­a­tions and ini­tia­tives see access to and use of the park as threatened.


Project

Par­ck­farm


Actors

Par­ck­farm T&T asbl, asso­ci­a­tion and coor­di­na­tion; res­i­dents of the neigh­bor­hoods, ini­tia­tives and col­lab­o­ra­tion; Alive Archi­tec­ture and Tak­tyk, cocu­ra­tion; IBGE — Insti­tut Brux­el­lois pour la Ges­tion de l’Environnement, com­mis­sion and co Winancing


Year

Since 2014, open­ing at the Par­ck­de­sign Biennale


Loca­tion

Brus­sels, Belgium

Par­ck­farm was ini­tial­ly planned for only five months, but thanks to the ini­tia­tive of numer­ous res­i­dents and oth­er sup­port­ers, it still exists six years lat­er. © Par­ck­farm T&T
Peo­ple from the neigh­bor­hood come togeth­er on-site to grow fruit and veg­eta­bles. Bees, chick­ens, ducks, and sheep are also kept. © Par­ck­farm T&T
The col­or­ful bee-cars or bee-wag­ons, which can be pulled by a bicy­cle, were devel­oped by the Roy­al Bee­keep­ing Soci­ety of Brus­sels and Sur­round­ings (SRABE). Bee­keep­ers like Mok­tar pro­duce and sell their hon­ey here. Vis­i­tors can tour the bee colonies and learn more about the crit­i­cal role these insects play in our liv­ing envi­ron­ment. © Dieter Telemans

/* Custom Archives Functions Go Below this line */ /* Custom Archives Functions Go Above this line */